Tangents  
New
 10 Jun 04 
Copyright © 2004 by owner.
Standard citation procedures apply.
Edited
 05 Jul 04 

 BUSH-WHACKED! 
This would be hilarious—if it weren't for real.


While criticizing challenger Senator John Kerry for "waffling," President George W. Bush has been a model of consistency—in a peculiar manner of speaking:  Time after time, he and members of his administration have said one thing, and then acted directly to the contrary.  "What's so strange about that?" you may ask. "After all, he's a politician.  Ha, ha!"  What's strange is that this is the comic stereotype, to which no real person in living memory has actually conformed more than slightly.  Practically any politician you can name has actually carried through on some, perhaps as many as half, of his or her promises.

But not G.W.Bush.  If we examine his record, we find that the number of times he has deviated from the absurd stereotype is astonishingly low.  This pattern of say-one-thing-and-do-another has been so consistent that duplicity has become the de facto watchword of his administration.  Time and again, Bush and his colleagues have sung the praises of various groups, programs, and ideals, and then systematically undercut those groups, underfunded those programs, and undermined those ideals.  Though there have been occasional exceptions, it is difficult to think of instances where Bush's policy of saying one thing and doing another has not been faithfully (if unscrupulously) applied.  Indeed, by now the pattern is so familiar and predictable that praise from this president is becoming regarded by many as something akin to a kiss of death.

I admit this might appear to be a joke.  It sounds far fetched.  The title seems comical, the claims exaggerated, and the commentary wry.  No doubt, some readers are convinced I'm either kidding or crazy.  But let's consider some examples, and then see whether anyone is still laughing.

 

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION RECORD
A Review of the Texas Chainsaw Presidency
WHAT THEY'VE SAID WHAT THEY'VE DONE
AFGHANISTAN: Following the 9/11 disaster, President Bush vowed to hunt down terrorists worldwide and bring them to justice. In a rare instance of actually fulfilling a public promise, the Bush administration sent troops to Afghanistan, which had been dominated by the brutally fanatical Taliban regime. Cooperative efforts between U.S. and Pakistani forces effectively drove out terrorist training operations from all but a few remote areas, and restored control of Afghanistan to the native population.
CHILDREN'S HEALTH: Bush has publicly praised health care and hospitals for children. Bush has tried to freeze grants for children's hospitals. He has proposed a $94 million cut in the Community Access program, which provides funding to hospitals in need. He is also trying to cut $158 million (68%) in training grants for specialties, including pediatrics. Meanwhile, his budget provides billions for the health insurers that have been among his major contributors.
CORE CONSTITUENCY: At a fundraising dinner limited to the very wealthy, Mr. Bush addressed those present as "a gathering of the haves and the have-mores." He continued, "Some call you the elite. I call you my base." Though intended to amuse his restricted audience, Bush'e remark was uncharacteristically accurate, unabashedly reflecting greed as the supreme value of his administration, to the exclusion of all other concerns except as expedient and convenient.
DEFENSE: Bush heaps praise upon America's military men and women, and declares that they should be the best trained and equipped in the world. While military spending by the U.S. exceeds that of all other nations combined, thousands of soldiers have been sent to war in Iraq without proper equipment and protection. Vehicles were inadequately armored for an environment in which land mines and rocket fire were to be expected. Initially soldiers even lacked Kevlar body armor, unless their own families bought it for them.
DEFICIT: Bush has attributed the federal deficit—which abruptly replaced the projected surplus he inherited from the Clinton administration—to a variety of causes: the economic recession, the 9/11 attacks, the war in Iraq, government spending. The Congressional Budget Office reveals that government spending now is "at a lower level than any year from 1975 through 1996." It also identifies the largest (36%) single contributor to the deficit as the Bush tax cuts, 90% of which went to the wealthiest Americans. It would seem, then, that this is the main reason Team Bush has needed to cut funding for everything else, from military armor to Medicare.
EDUCATION: Bush has promised substantial support for public education. He touts his "No Child Left Behind" program, which holds local schools accountable for students' performance. The requirement for improved performance is certainly long overdue. However, the Bush budget typically underfunds the NCLB program by about one third. Without adequate funding, many local schools find it impossible to comply with the law. Unable to attract and retain qualified teachers, they're forced to downsize or close, leaving hundreds of thousands of children—particularly the disadvantaged—behind.

Then, adding insult to injury, Education Secretary Paige has glibly characterized school teachers as terrorists. (He subsequently said he was only kidding, but this administration's systemic disconnection between rhetoric and reality gives us ample cause to wonder.)

EMPLOYMENT: Bush stresses the importance of jobs and the virtues of the American worker. He has often made photo-ops at industrial sites, talking and shaking hands with workers. It's ironic that some of the very factories where Bush has staged his publicity bids have downsized or shut down soon thereafter. Indeed, the Bush administration has itself moved some of its own publicity and fund-raising activities offshore, declaring outsourcing as "good for America.". But American workers whose jobs have been outsourced are apt to disagree.

Bush eagerly credits his policies with the recent creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs, though most of these offer lower pay than the millions previously lost. Attempting to shine the best possible light on the figures, he has proposed reclassifying fast-food preparation as a "manufacturing" job. Yet no matter how he juggles it, G.W.Bush can't squirm away from the fact that he is the first president since Herbert Hoover to preside over a net job loss.

ENERGY: President Bush affirms that he has put money and research behind alternative energy projects such as a hydrogen-fueled car. The potential benefit of alternate energy-source technology is reduction of dependence on non-renewable fossil fuels. However, the specific technology in question uses hydrogen converted from coal, oil, and gas. The plans for it were developed by the fossil fuel industries that have largely bankrolled the Bush-Cheney team, and the funding for it is siphoned off from programs that would actually reduce fossil fuel use..
ENVIRONMENT: On Earth Day in 2002, President Bush declared "we should do more at the federal level" to deal with air pollution. In 2004, the Wall Street Journal reported a meeting between the Bush administration and oil executives, to consider weakening EPA standards for pollutants in gasoline.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY: In promoting his tax cuts, Bush promised that his administration's budget would be balanced over the long term. Bush's administration inherited from Clinton's the first projected budgetary surplus in decades. But within Bush's first year in office—even before the 9/11 disaster—the surplus was being replaced by the largest projected deficit ever.
PERSONAL INCOME: As employment finally began to rise in 2004, Vice President Cheney remarked that "real incomes and wages are growing." A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute shows that, while corporate profits and CEO compensation have soared, real income for average workers has actually fallen. Newly created jobs typically pay 21% less than those that have been lost. Meanwhile, Bush is pushing to eliminate overtime compensation for 8 million workers, and opposes any increase in the minimum wage.
PRISONERS OF WAR: Bush distanced his administration from the maltreatment of Iraqi detainees at Abu Ghraib Prison, deploring those abuses as "disgraceful conduct by a few American troops who dishonored our country and disregarded our values." A 2002 White House directive characterizes the Geneva Convention protections for POWs (including Americans) as "quaint" and "obsolete." Communications among the President, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Ashcroft reveal deliberate intent to disregard this historic and humane international agreement. Over objections of State Secretary Powell and military lawyers, the administration has endorsed a secret system of detention and interrogation, in which humiliation and torture of detainees and prisoners is not only condoned, but actively encouraged by top White House officials.

Rather than addressing the abusive policy, the Bush White House has instead launched an assault against the soldiers and journalists who exposed the wrongdoing, claiming that such reporting "is undermining support for the war."

SENIORS' HEALTH: Bush has nothing but kind words for America's elderly. He says they deserve choices. Bush staunchly opposes allowing seniors to purchase discounted prescription drugs through Canadian suppliers. Furthermore, his modifications to Medicare force many seniors into HMOs, which enjoy generous government subsidies. His budget cuts are projected to drive Medicare into bankruptcy in a decade or so—about when demand for medical services by the "baby-boomer" generation approaches its peak. For millions of them, the choice will be between having food or getting medical care.

(So maybe you're not a senior. Do you have parents who are?)

SEPTEMBER 11 RESCUE: Standing atop a rubble heap at Ground Zero, President Bush lavishly praised rescue workers at the WTC disaster scene in New York. EPA press releases, intended to warn the public of toxic levels near Ground Zero, were altered by the White House Council on Environmental Quality (headed by James Connaughton, a former asbestos industry lawyer) to say that the air there was safe. When New York police and firefighters began falling ill, the administration sought to cut off health care screening and $90 million in health care funding. Though Congress overrode this move, New York is still struggling to find the means to provide these heroic individuals the care they deserve. Recently, 1,700 9/11 rescue workers have had to sue for desperately needed medical assistance.
SPACE EXPLORATION: Hoping to present a forward-looking image, Bush has proposed that NASA shift its emphasis toward mannned missions to the moon and Mars. At this point, manned interplanetary missions are not feasible. The only manned space vehicles the U.S. has today are the aging shuttles. The Apollo technology that took Americans to the moon 35 years ago has long since been dismantled, and the people who designed and worked on it are no longer around. A replacement would have to be virtually reinvented. And a manned mission to Mars is just a distant dream at this point.

However, NASA will indeed have to shift emphasis in one important sense.  Due in part to Bush's funding cuts, it will have to shut down the Hubble Space Telescope, whose astounding images have over the past 14 years reshaped the human vision of the universe.

SPECIAL INTERESTS: Bush criticizes his political opponents as "beholden to special interests and out of touch with regular Americans." If political contributions and favors are any indication, the Bush team is beholden to a great many special interests, including automakers, defense contractors, HMOs, insurers, meat processors, oil producers, and the pharmaceutical industry, to name but a few. Evidently, these are the sort of people Mr. Bush thinks of as "regular Americans."
TAX CUTS: Initially, candidate Bush called for tax cuts because the economy was doing so well. Then President Bush called for tax cuts because the economy was doing so poorly and needed a boost. Bush cut taxes, all right. But for the average worker, investor, or small business operator, the cuts add up to only a few hundred dollars. Elimination of the top tax bracket diverted most of the tax relief to those who need it least—large corporations and millionaires, whose tax cuts average out to nearly $90,000 apiece. This is what Mr. Bush calls "fair."

Fair or not, this latest attempt at supply-side strategy has been remarkable only in the duration of its ineffectiveness. Because trickle-down does little to stimulate broad consumer demand (without which business has little incentive to increase production and hiring), its real value as an economic stimulus is minimal to non-existent.

To be fair, Bush can't be blamed for the onset of cyclical economic contraction. But the economy has languished, for far longer and at far greater overall cost in debt, jobs, and capital, than would likely have been the case with prudent and timely targeting of resources. Now that the economy is finally struggling to rebound in its natural cycle, Bush is predictably eager to take credit.

TAX FAIRNESS: Bush has said he wants to "make sure the system is fair for those of us who do pay taxes," and that "we want everybody paying their fair share." In 2002, when Congress was attempting to close tax loopholes for offshore businesses, Bush allies killed the legislation. In June 2004, the Bush administration awarded a $10 billion Homeland Security contract to Accenture (formerly Andersen Consulting), a company that had moved its headquarters to Bermuda to avoid paying U.S. taxes.

In addition, Bush initiatives have reduced IRS audits of corporations while increasing audits of individuals.

VETERANS: Bush praises the courage, loyalty, and sacrifices of American military veterans, and proclaims that the nation owes them an enormous debt. Bush has tried to shut down veterans' hospitals across the nation, and has decided to cut off prescription drug benefits for 164,000 veterans. He has threatened to veto any bill allowing veterans to enjoy both pensions and medical benefits, and has planned, if reelected, to cut veterans' health care funding by $1 billion in 2005.
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: President Bush cited intelligence reports of Iraq's possession of WMD as justification for a preemptive strike. When, after the war was in progress, it came to light that the intelligence was very unreliable, there was great pressure on the president to establish an independent investigation. There is troubling evidence that Bush had intended to invade Iraq since even before September 2001. Shaky though it was, the "intelligence" of Iraq's alleged arsenal and dealings with al Quaeda afforded him an excuse to proceed, diverting precious resources from Afghanistan. When the intelligence indeed turned out to be bogus, critics called for an independent investigation. Yielding to persistent pressure, Bush finally complied. But, true to form, he insisted upon choosing the investigating team himself—contrary to established practice, and hardly a formula for an independent probe. And, of course, he set a target date comfortably after the November election.

Bush's habit of playing fast and loose with the truth has squandered the good will of the world following the 9/11 attacks. American credibility has been eroded nearly to levels characteristic of China and Iran, whose peculiar notions of truth are traditionally defined more by policy than by reality. Victims of Bush's web of confusion and deceit include not only the men and women of the American armed forces, but also the coalition allies, whose leaders are now suffering the domestic political consequences for having allied themselves with an impulsive warmonger.

(Comment: It is the misfortune of these allied leaders to be so accused by their countrymen, when in fact the grim specter of an unchecked superpower, led by a man with no clear concept of reality and apparently few scruples, has forced them into the unpleasant role of damage control. While they fully understand the threat that the Bush "Axis of Evil" crusade poses to world peace, they nevertheless realize that it is only through their active involvement that there can be any hope of mitigating that threat. Deluged by public criticism, they daily struggle to keep Bush from losing his focus on terrorism, tossing diplomacy out the window, and turning the entire Middle East into a war zone. Blair and the others, of course, cannot defend their unpopular stance by publicly discussing the situation's full implications, for to do so would certainly destroy what limited leverage their alliance provides to restrain the Bush loose cannon. But this American applauds these dedicated, far-sighted, self-sacrificing statesmen, who place the welfare of the world above their own political futures. Would that we Yanks had the wisdom to elect such leaders!)

Data are generated by numerous governmental and journalistic sources, acquired and released through The Daily Mislead and other channels, and distilled here for the reader's convenience. While effort is made to present material faithfully, no guarantee can be made against possible errors.

Yes, George W. Bush is amazingly consistent, in his curiously self-contradictory way. By comparison, even "Tricky Dick" Nixon could point with pride to some positive accomplishments of his administration. We would have to hark back to the combined administrations of Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover to find an example of consistent corruption, cronyism, and deterioration equivalent to that exhibited in the single term of G.W.Bush. In that brief span, the nation's economy has been hobbled, its poor and middle classes squeezed for the benefit of the wealthy, its children and elderly victimized, its military misused for dubious ends, its solemn agreements renounced at whim, and its credibility worldwide reduced to the level of those very "Axis of Evil" entities it despises. Even the traditional friends and allies now view the United States as out of control, a wild and undisciplined entity no longer to be respected and trusted, but only feared.

We could do well, in the opinion of many, with a substantially smaller measure of that sort of consistency. While we have no guarantee that John Kerry would be any better, the law of averages is strongly in his favor, for it is unthinkable that he could do any worse.

=SAJ=